CAMBS |
|
|
California Alliance of Massage and Bodywork Schools |
January 2004 |
AB1388 Update
AMTA-CA representatives have announced that they have decided to table AB 1388 for the time being. This means that at this time they will take no action on the bill, although it could be revived for this legislative session or reintroduced in 2005.
When contacted on January 5, 2004, Lou Correa’s office (chairman of the Assembly Committee on Business and Professions) said that the bill will definitely not be acted on this year, although it could be revived in 2005. However, since then the bill has been amended and re-referred to the B&P committee. There are still two small errors and a major one, which is that the 250 hour education requirement for the massage practitioner was deleted in error. Beverly May, of the AMTA-CA, says that these remaining errors will be corrected.
State
Senator Correa intends to hold an informational meeting on AB 1388, likely
in March 2004. According to Correa and his Principal Consultant David Pacheco,
such informational meetings are a common follow up to a regulatory bill not
having consensus within the affected profession. This informational meeting will likely have substantial impact on whether or not any future or reintroduced bill attempting to legislate massage is likely to be considered by the legislature. Send
your comments to Lou Correa directly, at the following address:
Lou Correa, B&P Committee
State Capitol,
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0069
(916) 319-2069
ABMP Hires Lobbyist
ABMP has announced that it
has retained the services of the firm of Foley and Lardner, lobbyists, to
represent their members’ interests in California. “The stakes are important enough for ABMP members that it is time
to retain counsel experienced in the ways of legislative development,” says Bob
Benson, president of ABMP. Although it
is far from certain that the bill will survive, Bensons said “we want a
lobbyist on the scene to respond if 11th hour, unsatisfactory proposals are
advanced by others.” Address any
questions or comments to Bob Benson at ABMP, via their website, www.abmp.com.
BPPVE Sunset Review
The
Bureau for Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education is currently under
review by the Assembly and Senate Joint Legislative Sunset Review
Committee. There will be a hearing by
the Joint Committee in March to review a special report on the Bureau. Any school director who is interested in the
March hearing should call the Joint Committee at 916-324-2506. School owners in California will definitely
be affected by any change in the Bureau, so this is of vital interest to our
members. For more information or to comment on the Education Reform
Act or Bureau itself, contact the committee chair person, Senator Liz Figueroa
at the following address:
State Capitol, Room 4061
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 445-6671
Fax (916) 327-2433.
Changes to STRF – SB 967
Last
year while the massage industry was embroiled in the effort for and against
massage licensing in California, the Senate passed Senate Bill 967 which has
significant language affecting massage schools that collect STRF funds.
SB 967 makes special
assessments legal and imposes a cap on the amount of any special assessment,
but not on the number of times the Bureau can make a special assessment. Special assessments will be considered a
credit against future STRF payments, and it appears that special assessments can
be passed through to students although it isn’t clear how this would be done.
The full text of SB 967, Section 9, has been posted on the CAMBS website and is available for your review. Other bills passed last year of
interest to us include the following:
SB 364 requires the
BPPVE to work with the Joint Legislative Sunset Review Committee to revise the
Education Reform Act and also requires the BPPVE to develop outreach programs
for high school students to inform them on how to choose a vocational school.
SB 907 establishes until July 1, 2009, the Naturopathic Doctors Act (Act), to be administered by the State Bureau of Naturopathic Medicine (Bureau), which this bill creates within the State Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA).
Alternate Considerations
The
purpose of AB 1388, or indeed any regulatory legislation, is to protect the
public. There is no proof that massage
is a danger to the public, or that any of the public have been seriously harmed
by massage therapists. Since it appears
that AB 1388 won’t be voted on this legislative session, there is time to for a
discussion of alternatives to licensing massage therapists which could achieve
the same goal of protecting the public.
According
to Keith Eric Grant, Medline citations of massage related injuries from 1965 to
2003 indicated only 11 cases in over 12 million reported medical
citations. There was no pattern of
repeated injuries nor significant statistics to support concern.1
Industry-wide, insurance rates increase in relation to increases in
claims. Rates that massage therapists
pay for liability insurance (a percentage of dues paid to professional
associations) have not significantly increased in ten years, which means
that although the number of massage therapists has increased, claims have not
increased. 2
Rather than create a new
regulatory board, there are two simple suggestions that might better serve the
public and our students. One step
would be to give SB 577 more impact by teaching our students and graduates how
to implement this law, and by notifying cities and counties that they have this
additional tool available for regulating massage in their communities.
The second step would be to have
a minimum requirement of subjects that must be taught in an entry-level
curriculum, including emphasis on contraindications, health and safety as well
as adequate instruction in massage skills, licensing requirements, self-care
and and related subjects.
A minimum curriculum would
ensure that all schools in California teach certain necessary information to
entry-level students, but the schools would also be free to teach any
additional courses they desire. Rather
than requiring all schools to make major changes in their curriculum, this
would mean that the schools with the very shortest programs would have to make
some small changes, and all schools would be required to teach safety, health
and contraindications.
SB 577
Even
though massage is not a harmful profession and there is little risk to the
public, there is some confusion in the public mind about the benefits and
purpose of massage, and even more confusion about the many kinds of massage
available to the public. Rather than
creating a new regulatory body, it may serve the public better if massage
therapists follow the requirements of SB 577, which became law in 2002.
The
act requires that non-licensed (that means no state license) health care
providers abstain from certain specific activities, and disclosed their
training, practices, and the theory of their type of work to the customer. They are required to present these
disclosures in writing to the client, obtain the client’s signature on a form
acknowledging receipt of the disclosures, give a copy of the signed document to
the client and keep the original on file.
If these requirements are followed, the public would be able to make
informed choices and to compare the education and services of different massage
therapists.
As
stated in SB 577, unlicensed health practitioners are NOT allowed to do the
following:
·
Conduct surgery or any other procedure on another person that punctures
the skin or harmfully invades the body.
·
Administer or prescribe x-ray radiation to another person
·
Prescribe or administer legend drugs or controlled substances to another
person.
·
Recommend the discontinuance of legend drugs or controlled substances
prescribed by an appropriately licensed practitioner.
·
Willfully diagnose and treat a physical or mental condition of any person
under circumstances or conditions that cause or create risk of great bodily
harm, serious physical or mental illness, or death.
·
Set fractures.
·
Treat lacerations or abrasions through electrotherapy.
·
Hold out, state, indicate, advertises, or imply to a client or prospective
client that he or she is a physician, a surgeon, or a physician and surgeon.
Unlicensed
health practitioners are REQUIRED to disclose to the
client, in a written statement using plain language, the following information:
·
That he or she is not a licensed physician and that the
treatment is alternative or complementary to healing arts services licensed by
the state.
·
That the services to be provided are not licensed by the
state.
·
The nature of the services to be provided.
·
The theory of treatment upon which the services are based.
·
His or her educational, training, experience, and other
qualifications regarding the services to be provided.
·
Obtain a written acknowledgement from the client stating
that he or she has been provided with the required information. The client
shall be provided with a copy of the written acknowledgement, which shall be
maintained by the person providing the service for three years.
More
information about SB 577 and a sample form can be found on line at the CAMBS website
listed at the bottom of this page.
Curriculum
Judith
McKinnon (McKinnon Institute) has said that the 100-hour practitioner is the
backbone of the profession in California.
It is true that the majority of practicing massage therapists in California
have taken basic training courses of less than 250 hours and have served their
clients well for many years. Since it
is possible, and indeed is the norm, for students to take entry-level training
and begin working, the public would be well-served if massage schools are
diligent about teaching contraindications, health and safety in their
entry-level courses.
In
1998 the BPPVE formed a task force in an effort to create a minimum curriculum
standard for massage schools. The question the task force grappled with was,
"how much training, and in what subjects, is necessary to turn out
graduates that are competent in one modality, safe (no harm to public or
selves), and marketable (able to get a job.)”
Although
the task force never finished its project, CAMBS has been working on it since
then. At almost every CAMBS meeting, school owners and managers have discussed
and outlined the topics that at a minimum should be taught to every massage
student and how many hours it takes to cover this specific material in a basic
massage course.
Such
a curriculum, based on content and needs, would more accurately reflect the
practice of massage in the real world, and would serve the needs of the
students and the public, rather than creating an artificial curriculum in an
attempt to fill up the number of hours required by a round-number established
before content and needs were analyzed.
Information on the results of
CAMBS’s research into massage curriculum, and CAMBS’s recommendations, can be
found at the CAMBS website. The url is
listed at the bottom of this page.
[1] Grant, K.E., Ph.D. “Injuries
Reported in Medline as Related to the Practice of Therapeutic Massage – 1965 to
2003” accepted for publication in Journal of Bodywork and Massage Therapies.
2 Studdert DM, Eisenberg DM,
Miller FH, Curto DA, Kaptchuk, TJ, 1998 Medical Malpractice Implications of
Alternative Medicine. The Journal of
the American Medical Association 280:1610-1615
CAMBS Board of Directors
Director: Teresa
Reynolds Nead
The
Body Institute
(916)
791-1951
Treasurer: Birgit
Ball-Eisner
Monterey
Institute of Touch
27820
Dorris Drive
Carmel,
CA 93923
(831)
624-1006
Secretary: Ramona Moody
French
Somatherapy,
Inc.
(760)
323-5806
Send
dues or registration fees to Birgit Ball Eisner. Send letters to the editor to Ramona Moody French. Send other correspondence to Teresa Nead.
Annual dues: $100.00
Meeting fees: $50.00 per school for
members
$50.00
per person for non-members
Registration Form - CAMBS
Meeting Location: Las
Vegas, NV Date: April 30, 2004 Time: 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Registration
Fee: $50.00 per school (members) $50.00 per
person (non-member) To
register for the meeting, please fill out and submit this form with payment
to: CAMBS
Meeting Registration Monterey Institute of Touch 27820 Dorris
Drive Carmel,
CA 93923 Name
_____________________________________________ Title
_____________________________________________ School
____________________________________________ Address
___________________________________________ City/State/Zip
Code__________________________________ Telephone__________________________________________ Fax
Number ________________________________________ Email
address _______________________________________ * Check here if 2004 dues ($100.00) are included with this
registration. Total
Enclosed $__________________________________ When
the registration form and payment are received, we will send you further
information about the meeting, including agenda, location, hotel
information, etc. The next CAMBS meeting has been scheduled to be held
on April 30, 2004 in Las Vegas, the day before the opening of the International
Esthetics, Cosmetics and Spa Conference at the Las Vegas Hilton Convention
Center (May 1, 2, & 3, 2004). This
gives everyone attending the CAMBS meeting an opportunity to also attend the
Esthetics/Spa conference. There will be
hundreds of manufacturers and distributors of massage and spa products as well
as many interesting classes for continuing education. To register for the CAMBS
meeting, send in the completed registration form to Birgit Ball-Eisner,
Treasurer, at Monterey Institute of Touch, at the address on the form. The meeting fee is $50.00 per member school,
and $50.00 per person from non-member schools.
The meeting is open to school owners and administrators only. To register for the
Esthetics Trade Show, contact Show Management at the address below: International Esthetics,
Cosmetics & Spa Conference May 1, 2 & 3, 2004 Las Vegas Convention Center Show Management, Inc. 800-624-3248 Fax: 805-995-2504 Email: info@iecsc.com Web: www.iecsc.com